Sunday, April 20, 2014

Covering Dallas, Monmouth, Independence, Falls City and surrounding areas since 1868

GUEST OPINION: Ken Allen

Proposed O&C plan is good for counties

October 03, 2012

U.S. Reps Peter DeFazio, Kurt Schrader and Greg Walden are right on in their thinking regarding upholding our commitment to rural communities in Oregon and elsewhere that have traditionally been dependent on federal timber receipts to help balance county budgets. Congress -- particularly their colleagues in the U.S. House -- should take heed.

Ken Allen

Ken Allen

Here in western Oregon, most of us are well aware of the history behind this issue. We have counties whose boundaries include more than 50 percent federal forestland. If trees aren't being cut -- and not many are today, because of litigation gridlock and environmental reasons -- that forestland becomes "dead space" for counties. There is no way to economically diversify federal forestland, and Uncle Sam doesn't pay property taxes. It's a lose-lose situation.

That's why our representatives' "O&C Trust, Conservation & Jobs Act" is so important. It will provide elected county leaders with sustainable and predictable revenue to support basic county services such as public safety and health. It creates desperately needed new jobs in rural counties at a time when Oregon continues to battle high unemployment. It also establishes a permanent baseline for sustainable timber production while protecting the rights of all landowners involved.

Moreover, it moves rural counties in Oregon (and again, elsewhere in the U.S. with the same problem) away from the uncertainty of the current federal payment program. For the past several years, re-upping the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 -- the formal name of the current "timber payments" program -- has come down to well past the 11th hour. Counties can't budget and plan for the future. County workers feel the stress of not knowing if their jobs will be there year-to-year. It's a broken system that serves no one well.

Our union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), has long been a strong advocate for solutions to this crisis. We represent the employees in many of the impacted counties. Our national union works this issue tirelessly in Washington, D.C. Our Oregon-based political staff partners with the Association of Oregon Counties and the Association of O & C Counties to do everything we can here at home.

It's been a long fight. I personally attended a major Portland summit on this issue with President Clinton when he was in office, and it seems we're no closer to a permanent solution now than we were then. That's why Reps. DeFazio, Schrader and Walden's plan is so important.

I don't need to itemize every point of the act, but as a union leader who advocates for Oregon's working middle class, I do want to stress that this plan prohibits raw log exports and imposes strong penalties on businesses that ship Oregon timber and the accompanying family-wage jobs overseas -- further reiterating the current law applicable to public lands. That's a key provision of this plan. Those family-wage jobs need to stay right here where the trees are grown to protect, preserve and expand Oregon's manufacturing base.

Finally, people nationwide need to understand this is not a handout to counties. It's no one's "fault" that Lane, Josephine, Coos and other counties are covered in trees. Outsiders need to stop blaming such counties for the situation they're in. The Oregon contingent's plan balances economic and environmental concerns in a practical manner, and helps move our vulnerable counties off of financial life support.

--

Ken Allen is the executive director of Oregon AFSCME Council 75, which represents about 25,000 public and private sector workers in Oregon. That number includes more than 6,500 county employees throughout the state. Most Polk County employees are represented by AFSCME Local 173.

Hot Jobs